Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1988 (8) TMI 53

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nce of the Revenue, to answer the following question of law, namely: "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally justified in holding that interest payments on the loans advanced by Tarachand and Rameshwardas representing their respective Hindu undivided families out of the Hindu undivided family funds were not inadmissible under section 40(b) of the In....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ance of the Revenue. The point involved for decision was considered at length by a Division Bench, of which one of us (J. S. Verma C.J.) was a member, in D. B. Income-tax References Nos. 1 of 1982 and 2 of 1982 decided on May 6, 1988, Gajanand Poonam Chand and Brothers v. CIT [1988] 174 ITR 346 (Raj). It was held therein that the Explanations inserted in clause (b) are merely declaratory. It wa....