Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1988 (9) TMI 33

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....CTG. C. J.-By this reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Indore Bench, Indore, has referred the following questions of law to this court for its opinion : "(i) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the liability determined under section....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the assessment year 1978-79, the assessee made a claim that on March 31, 1978, there was a total partition in the family and the property of the joint family was divided amongst the coparceners, Kanhaiyalal, Badrilal, Jugdishchandra and Smt. Gitabai. After making an enquiry as required by section 171 of the Act, the Income-tax Officer rejected the claim of the assessee that there was a partition i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ld that there was a partial partition. In reply, it was contended on behalf of the Revenue that after taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal had come to the conclusion that there was no partition of the joint family and that the reference, therefore, deserved to be answered against the assessee. Now, so far as the first question is concerned, it was not ....