Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1988 (9) TMI 33

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nce under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Indore Bench, Indore, has referred the following questions of law to this court for its opinion : "(i) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the liability determined under section 132(5) of the Income-tax ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the assessee made a claim that on March 31, 1978, there was a total partition in the family and the property of the joint family was divided amongst the coparceners, Kanhaiyalal, Badrilal, Jugdishchandra and Smt. Gitabai. After making an enquiry as required by section 171 of the Act, the Income-tax Officer rejected the claim of the assessee that there was a partition in the family. Aggrieved by t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....artition. In reply, it was contended on behalf of the Revenue that after taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal had come to the conclusion that there was no partition of the joint family and that the reference, therefore, deserved to be answered against the assessee. Now, so far as the first question is concerned, it was not disputed before us on behalf o....