Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1988 (9) TMI 31

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Revenue and the following two questions stand referred to us by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay Bench 'E', under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 : "(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the proportionate reduction in the capital on account of relief under sections 80-1 and 80M did not come within the scope of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... said question in accordance with the said decision in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee. That brings us to a consideration of question No. (2). As far as this question is concerned, the relevant discussion is to be found in paragraphs 5, 6, and 7 of the appellate order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. We are concerned with two assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73. For these year....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....95 ------------------ Total : Rs. 5,15,024 (1972 - 73 Assessment year)" ------------------ It was stated before the Tribunal, and which position was accepted by the Department, that the bonus paid by the assessee had been, for these two years, separately and independently debited to the profit and loss account and the bonus reserve had not been drawn upon for making such payment. Indeed, the....