2021 (2) TMI 9
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... Bodani, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. It is seen that against the order-in-original bearing No.26/2001-Commissioner M-VI dated 09.10.2001, petitioner had filed appeal bearing No.E/3850/2001 before the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Western Zonal Bench, Mumbai ('CESTAT' hereinafter). Again, assailing the order-in-or....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....08.04.2005 by subsequent order dated 20.06.2005. This subsequent order has been put to challenge by the petitioner before this Court in Writ Petition No.4516 of 2005 (A.S.). 5. Both the matters are listed today on praecipe filed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 6. It is submitted that Government of India has introduced the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (briefly 'th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....y the designated committee is much in excess of the dues declared by the petitioner and, therefore, the same has been put to challenge by the petitioner before the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur Bench in Writ Petition No.7087 of 2020. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in so far the disputes pertaining to the orders-in-original both dated 09.10.2001 relatable to the factori....