Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2012 (12) TMI 1208

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... This appeal is directed against the order pas sed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(A), Chandigarh dated 28.7.2012. 2. In this appeal the revenue has challenged the order of the ld. CIT(A) for deleting the penalty u/ s 271(1) (c) of the Act amounting to ₹ 12,03,242/ - by holding that denial of deduct ion u/s 80P(2) (d) of the Act is debatable. 3 After considering the rival submiss ion....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on confirmed by the High Court shows that the issue was debatable, therefore, the penalty was not leviable. In this connection, he relied on the decision of Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in case of CIT V. Buddhewal Coop Sugar Mills, 312 ITR 92 (PH). 6 We have heard the rivalsubmissions carefully and find that it is not disputed that originally the disallowance was deleted by the Tribuna....