Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1989 (3) TMI 119

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....I J. -Aggrieved by the refusal to allow the carry forward of losses as the return of income under section 139(1) of Income-tax Act was filed beyond time, the petitioner, a manufacturer and exporter of hand-knitted woollen carpets, has filed this petition. It has been urged that the law on the carry forward of losses having been settled by the Supreme Court, this court and other courts in numerous ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....atural justice or without jurisdiction. The decisions relied on by learned counsel for the petitioner in J. K. Synthetics Ltd. v. Bajpai (0. S.), ITO [1976] 105 ITR 864 (All), New India Investment Corpn. Ltd. v. ITO [1983] 143 ITR 909 (Cal) or observation made in Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd. v. ITO [1961] 41 ITR 191 (SC) need not be discussed, nor is it necessary to express any opinion on the applic....