2021 (1) TMI 356
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Kumar, Sr.DR ORDER PER R.K. PANDA, AM: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 19^th September, 2018 of the CIT(A), New Delhi, relating to assessment year 2014-15. 2. The assessee in its various grounds of appeal has challenged the ex parte order of the CIT(A) sustaining various additions made by the AO. 3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the ass....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....orities below. We find, due to non-appearance by the assesse before the AO, he passed the order u/s 143(3) r.w. section 144 of the Act, determining the total income of the assessee at Rs. 1,93,42,963/- as against loss of Rs. 1,20,92,632/- wherein he made addition of Rs. 3,14,35,595/- u/s 68 of the IT Act. We find, the ld.CIT(A) dismissed the appeal due to non-appearance by the assessee before him ....
TaxTMI