Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1989 (7) TMI 92

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., ACTG. C. J.-The following two questions were referred to this court under section 256 of the Income-tax Act : "(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally correct in holding that the partnership between the karta of the Hindu undivided family and the coparcener was a valid partnership ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....bute their skill and labour. In the assessment year 1972-73, the Incometax Officer refused to register the firm on the ground that the members of the family cannot enter into a contract with the karta of the same Hindu undivided family of which he was a member. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner allowed registration and the Appellate Tribunal affirmed the order of the Appellate Assistant Commiss....