TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2020 (12) TMI 638
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ad Singh ORDER 1. Heard Sri Dilip Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Gaya Prasad Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.1 and Sri Dhananjay Awasthi, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos.2 to 5 through video conferencing. 2. This writ petition has been filed asking for a writ of mandamus to the respondents to adjust the amount of Rs. 17,72,021/- deposited by the petitioner,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the demand of Rs. 44,39,787/- has attained finality. 4. According to the petitioner, he had deposited a sum of Rs. 17,72,021 by different challans. 5. The details of year-wise deposited amount of service tax have been given by the petitioner in a sheet filed as annexure-4 to the writ petition. If the petitioner has actually deposited the aforesaid alleged amount of Rs. 17,72,021/- towards servic....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tioner vide letter dated 08.09.2020 that the request for adjustment of Rs. 15,69,098/- in SVLDR Scheme was not considered since this amount was not entered in ST-3 Returns. That apart, the last date of payment under SVLDR Scheme was 30.06.2020 which has expired. The letter/order dated 08.09.2020 has not even been challenged by the petitioner in the present writ petition. That apart, adjustment of ....