Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2010 (9) TMI 1269

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n served with the order passed on 15,5.2009 by the Appellate Tribunal, Bench-'C', Ahmedabad being ITA No. 2742/Ahd/2004 for A.Y.2001-02 whereby the appeal of the Revenue has been partly allowed, 2,1 The brief facts of the case are that the appellant is a partnership firm and engaged in the business as Govt, Contractor. It had filed its return of income for AT.2001-02 on 31.10.2001 declaring total income at ₹ 7,49,984/- together with audited annual accounts. The total contract receipts disclosed were ₹ 1,51,62,748/- out of which the receipts from work given on subcontract were ₹ 1,13,69,558/- with agreement to receive net income at 4% from 2 contractors and of 1% from one sub-contractor. However during the course of ass....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Nirman Infrastructure which should be rectified u/s.254(2). It is, therefore, prayed that the order passed by the Tribunal may please be rectified by directing to AO to adopt net profit at 1% on the sub-contract receipts of ₹ 37 lakhs. Needless to say for this act of kindness, the applicant as in duty bound shall for ever pray and remain grateful". 2. At the time of hearing of the aforesaid Miscellaneous Application, on behalf of assessee Shri S.N. Divetia appeared and pointed out that one of the sub-contract works of ₹ 37 lakh was given to M/s. Nirman Infrastructure at a profit margin of only 1%. However, the Tribunal vide order dated 15.05.2009 in para 3 directed the Assessing Officer to compute the net profit @ 4% both....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....15.05.2009 has taken a conscious view keeping in view the past history of the case. The details of sub-contracts is as under :- Name of sub-contractor Amount of sub-contractor % of net profit as per agreement 1. Nirman Infrastructure 73,00,000/- 4% 2. Saraswati Construction 18,00,000/- 4% 3. Nirman Infrastructure 37,00,000/- 1% 5. From the above, it is also pertinent to note that in respect of one of the sub-contractors M/s. Nirman Infrastructure, the net profit of sub-contract as per agreement is 4%, whereas in respect of other contract, it is only 1%. It is true that Tribunal has not highlighted its facts in the aforesaid order, but in our considered opinion, it cannot be said that this was one of the factors, which was kept ....