2016 (4) TMI 1396
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....6 OF 2013 IN T. C. (C) NO. 101 OF 2012 - -<br>Indian Laws<br> Anil R. Dave, A.K. Sikri, R.K. Agrawal, Adarsh Kumar Goel And R. Banumathi, JJ. ORDER These review petitions have been filed against the judgment of this Court dated 18th July, 2013 passed in Christian Medical College Vellore & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors. reported in (2014) 2 SCC 305. The review petitions were placed before a ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nsidered the various judgments cited by them, which include judgments cited by the non-applicants on the scope of review in Kamlesh Verma vs. Mayawati and Others (2013) 8 SCC 320, Union of India vs. Namit Sharma (2013) 10 SCC 359 and Sheonandan Paswan vs. State of Bihar and others (1987) 1 SCC 288. After giving our thoughtful and due consideration, we are of the view that the judgment delivered i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e the re- hearing of the case, dictate the direction of the re-hearing and such direction, whether of binding or of persuasive value, would conceivably in most cases adversely affect the losing party at the re-hearing of the case. We are therefore of the view that the Review Bench in the present case could not be faulted for not giving reasons for allowing the Review Petition and directing re-hear....