Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2020 (10) TMI 375

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Advocate for the appellant Shri NN Prabhudesai, Superintendent (AR) for the respondent ORDER PER: C J MATHEW Of the two appeals filed against order-in-appeal no. SB(63)63/MI/2010 dated 18th November 2010 of Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai Zone- I, that of the assessee, M/s Nucleus Technologies, is brought to a closure by recourse to Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resol....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng of rule 209A of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944. It is also her submission that, with the discharge of the assessee under section 127 of Finance Act, 2019 the appellant has, unfortunately, been placed in a position where the allegation of clandestine removal itself, even if challenged, is beyond adjudication by us. She, therefore, urges that, in line with the decision of the Hon'ble Hi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s. On the contrary he has cited a number of decisions of the Tribunal, viz., Wipro Ltd v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad 92006 (196) ELT 226 (Tri.-Mumbai)], Paragon Steels (P) Ltd v. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Calicut [2018 (15) GSTL 298 (Tri.Bang.)], Mytri Enterprises v. Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai [2004 (174) ELT 389 (Tri.-Mumbai)] and Vishan Shamlal Milwani v.....