Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1990 (2) TMI 28

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... No. 8307 of 1989 is the appellant in this writ appeal. The respondent is the Revenue. The matter arises under the Income-tax Act. By exhibits P-1 to P-3, the petitioner-firm was assessed for the years 1979-80 and 1980-81. The appeals were disposed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) by exhibits P-4 and P-5. The Revenue, as well as the assessee (appellant) filed appeals before the Income-t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he appellant, Mr. M. C. Sen. It was argued that exhibits P-1 to P-3 orders, as well as the order rendered in exhibit P-6 are without jurisdiction. It was stated that exhibit P-6 is arbitrary. However that may be, it cannot be denied that the petitioner can ventilate his grievances against exhibit P-6 order by filing a reference application under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act. The petitioner....