Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1989 (12) TMI 19

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Wealth-tax Act, the petitioner seeks reference of the following question to this court : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that non-adherence to the provisions of section 16A of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, did not justify the conclusion that the order of assessment was erroneous in law and prejudicial to the interests of the Re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....unal followed its order for the earlier years wherein it had held that rule 1BB was applicable and the Wealth-tax Officer had in fact applied the said rule and the valuation was correctly arrived at. Being aggrieved, the petitioner filed a petition under section 27(1) but the same was rejected by the Tribunal. In our opinion, the real question which arose for consideration before the Tribuna....