2017 (5) TMI 1739

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....E for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR SN SOPARKAR, SR. ADVOCATE with MR B S SOPARKAR, CAVEATOR for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH) Draft amendment allowed. [1.0] Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 03.05.2016 passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "B" Bench, Ahmedabad (hereinafter referred to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....We have heard Shri Manish Bhatt, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue and Shri S.N. Soparkar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee. [3.0] Now, so far as proposed question of law No.(1) is concerned, it appears that the assessee claimed the revised working of capital gains in respect of transaction of BSE shares, however the same was denied by the Assessing Officer o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nces, present Tax Appeal qua question No.(1) stands dismissed. [4.0] Now, so far as the proposed question No.(3) i.e. whether the learned ITAT was justified in deleting the disallowance of deduction u/s 40(a)(ia) of Rs. 37,43,705/with respect to reimbursement of expenses is concerned, the said proposed question of law is also answered against the Revenue by the Division Bench of this Court in t....