Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (6) TMI 313

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....de-2016") in the format as prescribed under Rule 6 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as "AAA Rules") by the Applicant in the capacity of the Operational Creditor viz., Cellpap BV against the Corporate Debtor viz., M/s. Oren Hydrocarbons Private Limited. The Applicant seeks to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor, declare moratorium and appoint Interim Resolution Professional. 2. Part-I of the Application sets out about the details of the Operational Creditor from which, it is evident that the Operational Creditor is a Foreign Company with identification number 30135314. Part-II of the Application gives all the particulars of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Certificate of Inspection (iii) Packing List (iv) Demand Notice dated 12.06.2019 5. The Operational Creditor is a foreign company engaged in the business of trading paper, pulp and secondary fibers and supply paper and board for printing and packaging to customers around the world, and also provides raw materials to paper mills in various countries. The Corporate Debtor has given sales orders for the supply of Bleached Hardwood Craft Pulp during the month of November 2017. 6. The Corporate Debtor Company was engaged in production, processing and selling business of various products of Barite BaS04, Universally used as weighting agent. The Operational Creditor has submitted that the Company was having business dealing....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....bunal claiming the payment of USD 237044.75 which comes to around Rs. 1,68,77,586. It includes principal amount of USD 1,91,266.90 i.e. Rs. 1,36,18,203.3 as well as interest upto 24.06.2018 USD 17,087.81 viz. Rs. 12,16,652.07 and cost of collection USD 28,690.04 viz. Rs. 20,42,730.85. The claim was made by the Operational Creditor under the Provisions of IB Code 2016 and prayed for initiation of 'Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process' against the Corporate Debtor. 9. The Operational Creditor submitted that various timely communications were made in the form of e-mails, to the reply of those e-mails no fresh objection of material quality or dispute ever were raised by the 'Corporate Debtor' instead it was promised on the pretext....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t to the Respondent. The Respondent, not having accepted delivery of the goods, can not be held liable to pay the claimed amounts in the instant case. Further, the Applicant has violated the terms of contract, entitling the Respondent to refuse acceptance of the goods and payment: i) the Applicant has failed to make deliveries within the time stipulated in the Purchase Orders issued by the Respondent; (ii) the Applicant has failed to ensure delivery of goods at site, viz. The Respondent's factory premises, as per the Purchase Orders. The said orders only stipulating payment upon such delivery, the Respondent is not bound to make any payment; and (iii) the Respondent had also learnt that the Applicant has emplo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y demur. The documents such as 'Invoice' and 'Bill of Lading' are sufficient to prove the claim of the amount from the Respondent. The allegation that the Respondent did not accept the delivery of goods made by the Petitioner is merely an afterthought only in order to avoid making payments that legitimately due to the Petitioner. 15. With regard to Para no.4 of the Counter Statement that the consignment was made by the petitioner on the basis of 90 days credit basis which is a proper term used in export import consignments subject to the delivery of goods with proper procedure of the high seas international sales of goods. However, as per the email records the Corporate Debtor have no willingness to nature the payment on ....