2020 (5) TMI 515

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....k Sethi, Senior Standing Counsel And Mr. Varun Issar, Junior Standing Counsel for the respondent. ORDER AVNEESH JHINGAN, J. In reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, 'the Act'), following questions of law have been referred for opinion of this Court: "1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the order of the Appellate Tribunal, holdi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....H of the Act of Rs. 1,18,346/- was allowed. Aggrieved of the assessment order, appeal was filed. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), Jalandhar [for short, 'CIT (A)'] vide order dated 22.1.1987 allowed the appeal with regard to the issue of deduction under Section 80-HH of the Act. The matter was sent to the Assessing Officer to re-compute the deduction under Section 80-HH of the Act in re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... with regard to deduction under Section 80-HH of the Act was specifically decided by CIT (A) vide order dated 22.1.1987, hence the Assessing Officer could not have passed order under Section 154 of the Act for rectifying the mistake on the point which was subject matter in appeal. The contention raised is not well-founded. CIT (A) allowed the appeal holding that deduction under Section 80-HH of t....