Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2006 (9) TMI 605

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... S. Ravi for the Respondent. ORDER 1. In this petition filed under section 111A of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act'), the petitioner is seeking directions against Satyam Computer Services Limited ('the Company') to transfer 100 shares comprised in Certificate No. 95484 (DNR 9548301 to 9548400) and 100 bonus shares bearing Certificate No. 524329 (DNR 32900586 to 32900685) in its favour and iss....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 100 shares covered by Certificate No.95484 for valuable consideration and became entitled to get the shares transferred in its name. The petitioner, on receipt of the bad delivery advice, requested the second respondent, being the transferor, to execute a fresh transfer deed, but the latter failed to respond favourably in favour of the petitioner. At the instance of the petitioner, the Company in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... favour by rectifying the register of members and deliver the duplicate share certificate in lieu of the original shares lost by the petitioner. 3. According to the Company, the second respondent is the registered holder of 100 shares bearing Certificate No. 95484. The Company had issued bonus shares to all its registered shareholders as on 1-9-1999 and therefore, allotted bonus shares to the sec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oner to lodge the share certificate for transfer in its favour along with an indemnity-cum-undertaking. The original share certificate is reportedly lost by the petitioner and therefore, the Company has requested the petitioner to furnish appropriate orders from a competent Court of law. Shri S. Ravi, learned Counsel appearing for the Company submitted that the Company would abide by the decision ....