Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1991 (1) TMI 47

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Income-tax Act, 1961, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, has stated the following questions : " 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal's decision is not vitiated in law and whether there was material before the Tribunal for holding that the burden of proving absence of fraud or gross or wilful neglect in filing the return of income has been ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the penalty imposable exceeded Rs. 1,000, the matter was sent to the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner. The Inspecting Assistant Commissioner imposed a penalty of Rs. 9,000. He gave three grounds for imposing the said penalty. On appeal, the Tribunal dealt with each of the three grounds given by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner and negatived the same. Accordingly, it allowed the appeal. So ....