Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (5) TMI 66

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Process' against 'Print House (India) Private Limited'- ('Corporate Debtor'), one Miscellaneous Application was filed by 'Sify Technologies Limited' for additional information from the 'Resolution Professional' to enable the said Applicant to submit a 'Resolution Plan' and the only prayer was made to condone the delay of the submission of the 'Resolution Plan' as the Applicant is not in a position to reasonably evaluate the liabilities and claims that may devolve upon the said Applicant- 'Sify Technologies Limited'. 2. The Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai Bench, Mumbai on hearing the said Applicant- 'Sify Technologies Limited' and the 'Resolution Professional' and the party who submitted the 'Resolution Plan' ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d and allowed by the Adjudicating Authority by the same impugned order dated 7th August, 2019 admitting the claim of the Government Department. 6. The aforesaid combined impugned order dated 7th August, 2019 is under challenge in this appeal. 7. The Appellant who is one of the 'Resolution Applicants' submitted the plan within time. It has objection with regard to the plan as may be submitted by the aforesaid Applicants particularly 'Sify Technologies Limited'. 8. Learned counsel for the Appellant submitted that the last date for submission of the 'Resolution Plan' was 10th July, 2019 and 270 days was to expire on 14th July, 2019. 9. It was further submitted that the 'Resolution Applicant' based upon information/ data shared by the 'Reso....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hundred and eighty days, it may by order extend the duration of such process beyond one hundred and eighty days by such further period as it thinks fit, but not exceeding ninety days: Provided that any extension of the period of corporate insolvency resolution process under this section shall not be granted more than once. Provided further that the corporate insolvency resolution process shall mandatorily be completed within a period of three hundred and thirty days from the insolvency commencement date, including any extension of the period of corporate insolvency resolution process granted under this section and the time taken in legal proceedings in relation to such resolution process of the corporate debtor: Provided also that whe....