Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2012 (1) TMI 384

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... AO u/s.144 r.w.s. 147 of the Act was without supplying the reasons recorded for reopening of the case and therefore, the whole assessment against the provisions of the law, in violation of the principles of natural justice and hence deserves to be annulled." 2. The brief facts as appearing in the assessment order as under:- "the DCIT, Circle-1, Navsari vide his letter dtd. 6.8.1999 has referred the case of M/s. Deep Laxmi Apartment, Navsari to Assistant Valuation Officer, Baroda u/s.131(1)(d) of the I.T. Act to elucidate the correctness of the cost of land/bungalow/property, and requiring the AVO to inspect the land/property/bungalow and to determine the true and correct cost of land/property/bungalow etc. Accordingly, the DVO, Ahmedaba....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he case of Deep Laxmi Apartment for A.Y. 1998-99, 99-2000 and 2000-01." Before the Ld. CIT(A) the assessee raised ground No.4, which is reproduced as under:- "(4) The ITO, Ward-1, Navsari has erred in making assessment u/s.144 r.w.s 147 of the Act, without supply the reasons recorded for re-opening of the case is against the provisions of law and hence not justified." 3. The Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the ground of the assessee, which is reproduced for the sake of clarity as under:- "7.1 In this connection, the facts as laid down before me revels that no request to obtain the copy of the reasons recorded was separately made by the appellant before the AO. Secondly, the assessment proceedings were carried out in the case of "Deeplaxmi Apartm....