2020 (4) TMI 375
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... VISWANATH Respondent Advocate: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX TG ORDER: (Per Sri Justice M.S.Ramachandra Rao) This Writ Petition is filed assailing the order dt.23-12-2019 passed by the 1st respondent granting stay of collection of 50% of the disputed tax of Rs. 34,41,386/- on condition of the petitioner paying other 50% of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s treating them as goods coming under residuary V Schedule. 3. Petitioner contends that objections were filed on 15-11-2018, but the 4th respondent rejected the same and passed the revision order on 09-05-2019 for the years 2013-14 and 2014-15 confirming the levy of additional tax of Rs. 34,41,386/-. 4. Petitioner contends that petitioner filed an appeal before the Telangana Value Added Tax Appe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... order dt.09-05-2019 for the assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15 is pending consideration before the said Tribunal and the petitioner had already deposited 25% of the disputed tax. 8. Having regard to the Advance Rulings issued by the competent authority under Section 67 of the said Act, and since based on the Advance Rulings of the respondents, petitioner did not to collect tax at 5% on the pho....