Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (3) TMI 739

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....20<br>Central Excise<br>HON'BLE MR. ANIL CHOUDHARY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) Shri Bipin Garg & Ms. Rinki Arora, Advocates for the appellant Ms. Tamanna Alam, Authorised Representative for the respondent ORDER ANIL CHOUDHARY: All the three appeals are filed against common impugned Order-in-Appeal. hence all the appeals are taken up together for disposal. 2. M/s Shree Rathi Steel (Dakshin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e officers recorded statements as well as resumed records during the search. 5. During investigation it is appeared to revenue that suppliers of raw material had supplied raw materials to Biwadi RMPL without payment of duty and without invoices. Inquiry was also conducted against the raw material suppliers including appellant No.1 who had supplied Miss-roll to BRMPL. 6. Based on the 'Tally' ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppeals) also upheld the Order-in-Original. 9. I have heard Mr. Bipin Garg & Ms. Rinki Arora, learned Advocates for the appellants and Ms. Tamanna Alam, Learned Authorised Representative for the respondent-Revenue. 10. It has been argued on behalf of appellant No. 1 & 2 that the impugned order passed is based upon presumption and surmises. Whole of the case is based upon the Tally data taken ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(237) ELT 674 (Tri. Del)]. (iii) CCE vs. Chhaju Singh Kanwal [2011 (272) ELT 202 (Guj.)]. (iv) CCE vs. Shingar Lamps Pvt. Ltd. [2010 (255) ELT 221 (P & H)]. (v) CCE & ST vs. PD Industries [2016 (340) ELT 249 (Tri. Del)] 11. It was further argued that the demand is wholly time barred and also no penalty is imposable. 12. Learned AR Ms. Tamanna Alam supports the impu....