2020 (3) TMI 290
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....dge. For the Petitioner : Shri Nitin Agrawal, Advocate, Ms. Sweta Yadav, Advocate, Shri Pushpendra Yadav, Advocate For the Respondents : Shri G.S. Thakur and Shri Himanshu Sahani, Advocates ORDER PER : VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA, J.- Regard being had to the similitude of the issue involved in the present cases. They are being decided by this common order. For the sake of convenience, the facts are no....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... and accordingly directed to furnish the return within seven working days. According to the petitioner, the said show cause notice was not served to the petitioner, therefore, the petitioner could not file the return within the stipulated seven working days and accordingly the GST Registration of the petitioner got cancelled by the Sales Tax Officer. As and when the said information came to his k....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n appeal and therefore, the limitation ought to have been counted from the date of communication of the impugned order to the petitioner or when the said order came to his knowledge. It is further argued that the aforesaid facts have not been considered by the appellate authority while passing the impugned order. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents supported the impugned order and stated that ....