2018 (12) TMI 1798

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....UDAR(3456) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1 ORAL ORDER 1.0. Heard Ms. Prachiti Shah, learned advocate for Ms. Anuja S Nanavati, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr.Darshan Gandhi, learned advocate for Mr. S P Majmudar, learned advocate for the respondent. By this petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, the petitioner has prayed for winding up of the respondent compa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ntioned, which has been "refused" by the respondent company, as can be seen from the postal endorsement at page nos. 43 and 44 of the paper book. No reply was filed to the statutory notice and even in reply to the petition after notice was served, as rightly pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner is moonshine defence even the technical defence that the statutory notice was not served, i....