2020 (2) TMI 1733

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....EEV NARULA JJ. Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Amit Shrivastava and Mr. Ankul, Advs.   Respondent Through: Mr. Raghvendra Singh and Ms. Easha Kadian, Advs.   O R D E R We have heard learned counsels for the parties. The following questions of law arise and are framed in the present appeal for our consideration: "A. Whether the IT AT was correct in law in exerci....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ll the appeals of the assessee back to the file of the learned dispute resolution panel with a direction to first ascertain the fact about the admission of the assessee with respect to acceptance of the assessee of the existence of the permanent establishment. If it is found that there is an admission on part of the assessee about the existence of the permanent establishment, then, the learned dis....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... well as the profit attribution thereto would be open before the learned dispute resolution panel." Mr. Vohra, learned senior counsel for the appellant has submitted that the Tribunal being the last fact finding authority should have examined, firstly, the issue whether there was any concession made by the appellant with regard to existence of PE in India on its own, since the same was a matter o....