2020 (2) TMI 445
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Tax<br>HON'BLE MR C J MATHEW, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) AND HON'BLE MR AJAY SHARMA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) Shri VM Doiphode, Advocate for the appellant Shri Dharmednra Singh, Superintendent (AR) for the respondent ORDER PER: C J MATHEW These applications, under section 35C of Central Excise Act, 1944 as applicable to Finance Act, 1994 seek, rectification of mistake claimed to be apparent in order no. A/8....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... earlier decision in 3i Infotech Ltd v. Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-II [final order no. A/94391/6/STB dated 9th December 2016] and in Milind Kukarni v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-I [2016 (44) STR 71 (Tri-Mumbai)], did not render a finding flowing these decisions. 3. Learned Counsel for applicant informs that the original authority has, without taking cognizance of the pendency o....