Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (2) TMI 219

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rrent Bank Account No.18381131000527 of Petitioner Leela Devi in Oriental Bank of Commerce which was freezed out in Session Case no 427/2019 pending trial in the Court of Shr. Ajay Kumar Jain, Special Judge (NDPS Act)/ASJ, New Delhi in case titled as Narcotic Control Bureau Vs Vinay Kumar Ray & Ors filed under section 21, 29 NDPS Act. It is further prayed that necessary directions may be issued for investigating officer for misleading the Ld Special Judge, NDPS Act by giving the statement that financial investigation is still pending without filing any documents in this regard and stating under which provision of law the financial investigation is pending and by making the statement that the Ld Special Judge have no jurisdiction to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the competent authority within 30 days of the passing of the order was to decide whether to give confirmation or not. 5. It is averred that the present writ petition has been filed on the basis of issuance of letter dated 22.05.2019 to O.B.C. Bank but the said letter has not been placed before the Court at the time of filing of the writ petition and the freezing order dated 30.10.2019 passed by the IO has also not been placed on record. This order dated 30.10.2019 was sent to the competent authority for its confirmation on 31.10.2019. It is submitted that the interim order of the stay of the proceedings on the basis of notice dated 31.10.2019 has been procured by misrepresentation as this Court has referred the prayer of the writ petiti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he competent authority was not in a position to conclude the process of confirming or declining the freezing order dated 30.10.2019 which is not under challenge. It has also been averred that the time for completion of the proceedings by the competent authority to either confirm or decline the freezing order be extended by 25 days from the date of disposal of this petition so that clear 30 days as prescribed under the Act are available to the competent authority to decide the freezing order passed by the IO on 30.10.2019. 7. In the instant case, by virtue of this writ petition the petitioner has only challenged the order dated 22.05.2019 bearing No. VIII/07/DZU/2019-1398 which according to the petitioner has been issued for freezing the ....