Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2020 (1) TMI 1142

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ORAL ORDER PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA 1. This Tax Appeal, under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is at the instance of the Revenue and is directed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Surat Bench dated 24.06.2019 in ITA No.2026/Ahd/2016 for A.Y.2013-2014. 2. The Revenue has proposed the following questions as substantial questions of l....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the decision of Ld. CIT(A) deleting the addition made u/s. 68 and 69 of the Act without appreciating the fact that the assesssee had raised contradictory and unclear stands? (iv) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble ITAT is right in upholding the decision of Ld. CIT(A) deleting the addition of Rs. 23,00,000/- on account of unexplained cash cred....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed from Shri Turmish B. Kaniya was purchased by the assessee. The original purchase deed filed in respect of said land Revenue Survey No.R.S.No. was actually purchased by Shri Karambhai, brother of the assessee as per purchase agreement dated 02.01.2013 filed before the AO. Therefore, no addition can be made in respect of un-signed, unstamped, Satakhat, which has not been registered and is found f....