Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2020 (1) TMI 121

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pellant by: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCIT Respondent by: None ORDER PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER: The Revenue has filed the appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-6, Chennai, dated 15.09.2017, for the assessment year 2007-08. The assessee has also filed cross-objection against the very same order of the CIT(Appeals). Therefore, we heard the appeal of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tate, there is no error in the order of the CIT(Appeals). Even in respect of investments made in subsidiary company, there was no exempt income earned by the assessee. therefore, there is no question of any addition / disallowance with regard to expenditure. Therefore, this Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the lower authority and accordingly the same is confirmed. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ubject to the above observation. This Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the lower authority and accordingly the same is confirmed. 6. Now coming to the cross-objection filed by the assessee, the only issue raised in the cross-objection is with regard to leave encashment to the extent of Rs. 14,41,057/-. 7. The Assessing Officer as well as the CIT(Appeals) disallo....