Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (12) TMI 955

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Mr. Pratap Singh, Adv. JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) 1. The present writ petition has been preferred for getting a refund claim of Rs. 42,23,111/- which this petitioner has deposited with the respondent. 2. Having heard counsel for both sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the goods in question are polyester cloths. According to the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fication was decided by the Assessing Authority. The reasons for seeking retest as enumerated in the grounds of appeal are also worth considering as the CRCL is the Competent Authority to provide the nature of the goods based on a scientific testing of the admitted samples. It is also observed that the appellant was provided fair opportunity of representation in accordance with the Orders of the H....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in allowing re-test, especially, when the disputed issue is involving the technicalities 'of the impugned goods. The' Customs Manual Chapter 3, Para 15 also provides for re-test as contended by the appellant. Since the Department is quite sanguine about test results, why fight shy of second test, which is permissible, under the law. Hence it is so directed and appeal is technically dispos....