Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1993 (2) TMI 52

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in rejecting the contention of the appellant that the assessee-company does not manufacture textile machinery or accessories and, therefore, is not qualified for deduction or relief under section 80-I ? 3. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that Rs. 3,596 being education cess for the earlier years is not deductible ?" The assessee manufactures humidifiers which are used in textile mills. During the assessment proceedings pertaining to the assessment year 1972-73, the assessee claimed a deduction under section 80-1 in respect of humidifiers manufactured by it on the ground that they are textile machinery or textile ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ured by it are either textile machinery or textile accessories. For the reasons recorded in the said judgment, we hold that the assessee was entitled to the benefit of section 80-I in respect of the humidifiers manufactured by it. The Tribunal has rejected the claim of the assessee for deduction of Rs. 3,596 being the amount of education cess payable for the financial years 1966-67 to 1970-71 on the ground that the assessee had not placed necessary facts for consideration of the authorities, and that it was not possible to know what was decided by the Gujarat High Court and the Supreme Court and what was the agreement between the assessee and the Municipal Corporation. Thus, it was not known under what circumstances the assessee had made a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e assessee may claim a deduction in a subsequent year in which the tax is assessed and the demand is made, although the transactions may pertain to earlier years, or he may even postpone his claim to deduction to the year in which he loses in appellate proceedings and the levy becomes final. It is not in dispute that the assessee did receive a bill for payment of education cess.. The amount payable is also now not in dispute. It is also not in dispute that education cess is payable by the assessee. The dispute between the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation and the industrial units having been resolved by an agreement and the industrial units having accepted the liability to pay education cess, it was not open to the Revenue, nor was it compete....