Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (12) TMI 784

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the case are that the appellant, M/s. Anmol Industries Limited, is engaged in the business of manufacture of different varieties of Biscuits falling under Chapter No. 19 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. 3. Based on an EA 2000 audit of the excise and service tax records of the Appellant for the period 2013-14 and 2014-15, a Show cause notice dated 26.05.2016 was issued alleging irregular availment of Cenvat credit to the tune of Rs. 4,62,741/-. The said SCN culminated into Order-in-Original dated 16/02/2018 wherein the Adjudicating authority confirmed the total demand as proposed in the Show Cause Notice alongwith interest and imposed penalty and ordered for appropriation of amount of Rs. 251,816/- as duty and interest of Rs. 77,84....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ty. 6. The learned Authorized Representative for the Revenue, on justified the impugned orders. 7. Heard both sides and perused the appeal records. 8. The short issue that arise for consideration in the instant appeal is whether the Appellant is required to again reverse the full amount of Cenvat credit on account of ineligibility of Cenvat credit availed by the Appellant during the period in which the reversal of Cenvat credit as per the procedure laid down Rule 6(3) (b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for proportionate reversal of Cenvat credit during the said period has already been done by the Appellant. The Appellant has also produced a CA certificate showing the reversals made for the FY 2014-15 on account of following the proc....