Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (12) TMI 726

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ngaged in rendering taxable services. The appellants filed a refund claim of service tax of Rs. 8,97,340/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs Ninety Seven Thousand Three Hundred and Forty only) dated 18/12/2017 before the respondent (received on 20/12/2017). In the instant refund claim, it was stated by the appellant that they had paid service tax of Rs. 59,82,624/- (Rupees Fifty Nine Lakhs Eighty Two Thousand Six Hundred and Twenty Four only), interest of Rs. 44,363/- (Rupees Forty Four Thousand Three Hundred and Sixty Three only) and penalty of Rs. 8,97,340/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs Ninety Seven Thousand Three Hundred and Forty only) as per the audit objections. However, later on, they realized that there was no necessity of payment of interest or penalty u....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....le in law as the same has been passed without properly appreciating the facts. He further submitted that there was no suppression on the part of the appellant and therefore, the question of payment of penalty does not arise. He further submitted that the penalty cannot be imposed without issuance of show-cause notice. He also submitted that there was no suppression on their part and the demand was for the normal period and neither the audit had alleged anything regarding suppression of facts. He further submitted that tax and interest was paid before the issuance of show-cause notice and the said amount was paid out of the credit and the said credit was not used. He further submitted that appellant was not given sufficient time to produce t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ression, fraud, willful misstatement etc. even when the demand is within the normal period. 6. After considering the submissions of both the parties and perusal of the material on record, I find that the payment of 15% penalty was voluntary and based on this voluntary payment, show-cause notice was waived and there was no protest raised by the appellant while making the payment. Further, I find that as per the Board clarification dated 18/08/2015, payment of penalty without issuance of show-cause notice was in accordance with law. Further, I find that the claimant had filed a declaration while seeking waiver of show-cause notice that the amount paid will not be sought as refund. Further, I find that the Commissioner (Appeals) has given suf....