Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (12) TMI 117

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....etitioners has placed reliance upon the decision rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Bharatbhai Naranbhai Vegda & Ors. v. State of Gujarat & Ors., reported in 2016(2) GLR 1021. It is submitted that the issue involved in the present petition is squarely covered by the said decision. 3. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader has placed reliance upon the decision rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Haldia v. Krishna Wax P. Ltd. in Civil Appeal No.8609 of 2019. Relying upon the aforesaid decision, learned Assistant Government Pleader has submitted that this petition may not be entertained. 4. This Court is, prima facie, of the view that in the afores....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sing the writ petition against a mere show cause notice." It is thus well settled that writ petition should normally not be entertained against mere issuance of show cause notice. In the present case no show cause notice was even issued when the High Court had initially entertained the petition and directed the Department to prima facie consider whether there was material to proceed with the matter." However, prima facie, this decision would not render any assistance to the learned Assistant Government Pleader in the facts of the present case. 5. In the present case, admittedly, the entry in question was mutated in the revenue record on 22.03.2001, which was subsequently certified on 03.08.2001. Now, the impugned show cause n....