2019 (12) TMI 113
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....KUMAR, TECHNICAL MEMBER Mr. Md. Rahim, Advocate, Mr. K.S. Ravi Shankar, Advocate For the Appellant Mr. P. Gopa Kumar, Jt. Commissioner (AR) For the Respondent ORDER PER : P. ANJANI KUMAR M/s. D & M Natural Fragrances had surrendered registration obtained for manufacture of excisable goods; on the basis of audit conducted on the unit, department opined that the company is bound to pa....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rejected vide orders 106-107/08 dated 29/02/2008. The appellants preferred an appeal before CESTAT, who vide Final Order 917-918/2008 dated 25/07/2008 set aside the impugned orders and remanded the issue to be decided again by following principals of natural justice. 2. In de novo order no. 41/2009 dated 31/07/2009, Commissioner appeals has confirmed a demand. The appellants contention was that....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ppellants have filed two appeals, E/968/2009 and E/969/2009, against the OIA 41/2009 dated 31/07/2009. Tribunal in the above said decision considered the appeal E/968/2009 and the present appeal E/969/2009 remained to be decided. The same is listed today for hearing and decision. Ongoing through the CESTAT's order in Appeal No. E/968/2009, it is seen that the appeal was with respect to the duty on....
TaxTMI