2019 (11) TMI 497
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....(TECHNICAL) AND HON'BLE MRS. RACHNA GUPTA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) Shri A.K. Batra, CA for the Appellant Shri R.K. Majhi, Authorised Representative (DR) for the Respondent ORDER RACHNA GUPTA Present order disposes of an application praying for rectification of mistake in final order bearing No. 53357/2018 dated 05.12.2018. Learned Counsel for the applicant has submitted that this Tribunal in the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....orted as 2006 (198) ELT 340 (Gujrat) and Dewsoft of Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, New Delhi reported as 2016 (44) STR 597 have been relied upon. Application is prayed to be allowed. Per contra it is submitted on behalf of the department that the impugned appeal has been allowed by way of remand. The demand of Service Tax has been confirmed on principle, however, quantificati....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ncy and manpower supply services from the appellant. The impugned final order after relying upon the decision in the case of Rajasthan Ex-servicemen Ltd. Vs. CCE, Jaipur reported as 2017 (52) STR 42 Tribunal Delhi which has also been confirmed by the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court has set aside the contention about show-cause notice being vague and arbitrary. The contention about show-cause notice b....