Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2018 (9) TMI 1908

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ourt under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing the impugned orders dated 29.8.2018 and 10.5.2018 passed by respondent no. 1 National Company Law Tribunal, Allahabad (NCLT). Respondent no. 2 Aryan Traders, one of the creditors of respondent no. 3 R.B. Rice Mills Private Limited initiated proceedings for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2010 (IBC) against respondent no. 3. The above petition has been admitted and a moratorium has been declared against respondent no. 3 w.e.f. 9th May 2018 till completion of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process vide order dated 10.5.2018. At the same time Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) has been appointed with the dir....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ining amount of Rs. 1 crore 62 lakhs within 15 days and it was made clear that on deposit of the balance amount only the sale certificate shall be issued to the petitioner. The petitioner has not deposited the entire bid amount of Rs. 2 crore 16 lakhs. He has only deposited the earnest money of Rs. 21, 60,000/- and a sum of Rs. 32,40,000/-; total Rs. 54,00,000/- and was required to deposit the balance amount of Rs. 1 crore 62 lakhs within 15 days from the date of auction and for deposit of the same he had applied for extension of 45 days time which had been extended from time to time but has not deposited the entire amount. It is admitted that there is no provision in IBC for review of the order admitting a petition filed under Section ....