2019 (10) TMI 453
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....SAINI, J.M. This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-XX, New Delhi, Dated 19.11.2014 for the A.Y. 2010-2011, challenging the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961. 2. We have heard the Learned Representatives of both the parties and perused the material on record. 3. The assessee in the present appeal has challenged the levy of penalt....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... India Life Insurance Company Ltd., 2019 (8) TMI 409 (Del.) vide Judgment Dated 02.08.2019 in paras 21 and 22 held as under : "21. The Respondent had challenged the upholding of the penalty imposed under Section 271(1) (c) of the Act, which was accepted by the ITAT. It followed the decision of the Karnataka High Court in CIT v. Manjunatha Cotton & Ginning Factory 359 ITR 565 (Kar) and obse....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....elied upon Judgment of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Sundaram Finance Ltd., vs. CIT [2018] 93 taxmann.com 250 (Mad.) and Judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sundaram Finance Ltd., vs. CIT [2018] 99 taxmann.com 152 (SC). 6. We have considered the rival submissions. In this case, the A.O. issued show cause notice for levy of penalty in which A.O. has mentioned both the limbs....