2019 (10) TMI 453
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Rana, CIT-D.R. ORDER PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-XX, New Delhi, Dated 19.11.2014 for the A.Y. 2010-2011, challenging the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961. 2. We have heard the Learned Representatives of both the parties and perused the material on record. 3. The assessee in the p....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....le Delhi High court in the case of Pr. CIT vs. M/s. Sahara India Life Insurance Company Ltd., 2019 (8) TMI 409 (Del.) vide Judgment Dated 02.08.2019 in paras 21 and 22 held as under : "21. The Respondent had challenged the upholding of the penalty imposed under Section 271(1) (c) of the Act, which was accepted by the ITAT. It followed the decision of the Karnataka High Court in CIT ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the other hand, relied upon the Orders of the authorities below and relied upon Judgment of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Sundaram Finance Ltd., vs. CIT [2018] 93 taxmann.com 250 (Mad.) and Judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sundaram Finance Ltd., vs. CIT [2018] 99 taxmann.com 152 (SC). 6. We have considered the rival submissions. In this case, the A.O. issued sho....
TaxTMI