Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (10) TMI 162

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri. M. Kannan, Advocate for the Appellant Shri. B. Balamurugan, Authorized Representative for the Respondent ORDER The issue involved in all these three appeals being the same, they are heard together and disposed of by this common order. 2.1 Brief facts are that the appellants filed refund claim towards Excise Duty paid on petroleum products cleared to customers at the rate fixe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ioner (Appeals), who relying upon the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Commissioner of Central Excise, Madras Vs. M/s. Addison & Co. Ltd. reported in 2016 (339) E.L.T. 177 (S.C.) upheld the rejection of the refund claims. The details of the refund claim in the appeals as well as the periods of dispute are given as under : Appeal No. Order-in-Appeal No. & Dt. Period of dispute Amou....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Welfare Fund. 4. Ld. AR Shri. B. Balamurugan appearing on behalf of the respondent supported the findings in the impugned order. He much emphasized on the discussion made by the Commissioner (Appeals) referring to the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of M/s. Addison & Co. Ltd. (supra) and submitted that the facts are similar, wherein the credit notes were issued to the buyer for ....