Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (9) TMI 1081

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... No. 20697 of 2019 - -<br>GST<br>MR S. V. BHATTI, J. For The PETITIONER : ADVS. SRI. HARISANKAR V. MENON AND SMT. MEERA V. MENON For The RESPONDENTS : GP DR. THUSHARA JAMES JUDGMENT Heard Smt. Meera V. Menon the learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr.Thushara James, the learned Government Pleader. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order in Ext.P1 filed appeal in Ext.P2 befor....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 14.5% under the cover of 8FA describing the commodity as Roofing material @5% misclassification of goods for the sake of tax evasion is proved. Hence the penalty is lawful. Inspite of this the Default on the part of the appellant to present his case shows that he does not have any valid documents to prove his grounds. On the appeal file also he has not submitted any documents or evidence....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ect pointed out and not attended by the appellant, further defect is noted and attended by the appellant but not to the satisfaction of the procedure followed by the appellate authority. According to the counsel, if at all the omissions were pointed out, the appellant would have certainly attended to the defects/omissions noted by the 3rd respondent, got them cured or filed reply and thereafter th....