2019 (9) TMI 355
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....spondent : Mr.Venkata Narayanan for M/s.Subbaraya Aiyer Padmanabhan COMMON JUDGMENT T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J. We have heard Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel assisted by Ms.K.G.Usharani, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant - Revenue and Mr.Venkata Narayanan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent - assessee. 2. These appeals, filed by the Revenue under Sectio....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that when the assessee was found to have been maintaining two sets of accounts, he could disown one set of accounts without any obligation to explain the discrepancies within the two sets of accounts and thereby holding that no penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act could be levied for c....