Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (10) TMI 697

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ir, JJ. Sri.P.Kesavan Nair For The Petitioner. Judgment Balakrishnan Nair,   The petitioner was the applicant in OA No.287/05. The respondents herein were the respondents in the OA. 2. The brief facts of the case are the following. The petitioner is an Income Tax Inspector. For promotion to the post of Income Tax Officer, he should clear the departmental test consisting of five....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... aggregate. For the purpose of aggregation, the marks in the subject Examination of Accounts and the Language Test Paper will be restricted to 100. 2. A candidate who has secured 60% or more marks in a particular subject or subjects in one examination will be exempted from appearing in that subject or those subjects in the subsequent examinations. For the purpose of reckoning 60% marks in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 44 and 37 marks for Papers I & II respectively. In 2002 also, he attempted those two papers of the said subject and got 57 and 56 marks respectively out of 100. He submits, if his marks for the said subject for the year 2002 are reckoned, it can be taken that he has cleared the examination. But the respondents are reckoning only the marks of 2003 examination. Feeling aggrieved by the said interpr....