2019 (7) TMI 822

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....akam Murali, Superintendent, AR For the Respondent ORDER Per : S.S GARG The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 28.02.2018 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the Commissioner (Appeals) has rejected the appeal of the appellant. 2. Briefly the facts of the present case are that the appellants are manufacturers of chewing scented tobacco/zarda falling und....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....-in-Original dated 06.04.2017 confirmed the demand of Rs. 2,48,648/- along with interest and imposed a penalty of Rs. 24,664/-. Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant filed appeal before the Commissioner who rejected the same. 3. Heard both the parties and perused the records. 4. Learned Counsel for the appellants at the outset fairly conceded that on merit, he has no case in view of the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 5. On the other hand, learned AR defended the impugned order. 6. After considering the submission of both the parties and perusal of the material on record, I find that on merit, the appellant has fairly conceded the case in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Cellular Operators Association of India (supra). As far as penalty is concerned, I find that it wa....