2016 (1) TMI 1420
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....lur, Adv. For The Petitioner. Shri.S.V.Giri Kumar, AGA For The Respondent. ORDER The Government Advocate is directed to take notice. The petition is heard at the stage of Preliminary Hearing and is disposed of in terms of an earlier order in similar circumstances, in WP No.54688/2015 and connected cases, dated 05.01.2016, in the case of M/s Bharath Construction Company vs. The State of Ka....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nd that there is no provision under the Act for such adjustment of tax, the petitioner is before this Court. 3. It is noticed that Division Bench of this Court in Warsaw Engineers, Bangalore vs. The Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, 2008 (64) KLJ 1134, had addressed the very same circumstance and it was held that the amounts paid to the sub contractor by the principal contractor whic....
TaxTMI