2018 (8) TMI 1835

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....K. Mahlotra, CA, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Ashok Jindal, Member (J)]. - Revenue is in Appeal against the impugned order wherein the benefit of the Notification No. 1/2010-C.E., dated 6-2-2010 has been granted to the respondent. 2. The facts of the case are that the Respondent are engaged in the manufacture of Rosin & Terpene of the 1st Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Ac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s below. Against those orders, Revenue is before us. 3. Ld. AR appearing on behalf of the Revenue submits that as the Respondent has availed the benefit of Notification No. 56/2002-C.E., dated 14-11-2002 in December, 2002, therefore, they are not entitled to claim the benefit of Notification No. 1/2010-C.E., dated 6-2-2010. Therefore, the impugned order is to be set-aside. 4. Heard the....