2018 (8) TMI 1835

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Ram, AR, for the Appellant. Shri S.K. Mahlotra, CA, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Ashok Jindal, Member (J)]. - Revenue is in Appeal against the impugned order wherein the benefit of the Notification No. 1/2010-C.E., dated 6-2-2010 has been granted to the respondent. 2. The facts of the case are that the Respondent are engaged in the manufacture of Rosin & Terpene of the 1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hich were sanctioned by both the authorities below. Against those orders, Revenue is before us. 3. Ld. AR appearing on behalf of the Revenue submits that as the Respondent has availed the benefit of Notification No. 56/2002-C.E., dated 14-11-2002 in December, 2002, therefore, they are not entitled to claim the benefit of Notification No. 1/2010-C.E., dated 6-2-2010. Therefore, the impugned....