2019 (6) TMI 449
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....p. Counsel with Mr. S. B. Gore, AGP for the Respondent-State. P.C: Petitioner is original Petitioner in Writ Petition No.2283 of 2013. 2. Petitioner's grievance is that, the Departmental authority has not paid him the amount of reward payable under a scheme which envisages that, in case, tax recovery is made, based on information provided by the informant, the certain amount of reward....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... mere computation of the reward amount which may became, eventually payable, if all tax disputes end in favour of the Government. He, however, relied on a statement made in para 8 of the Affidavit in reply dated 21st September, 2015 of the Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax, in which, it is stated that: "I say that at this stage part of the recovery is pending due to pendency of first or sec....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....bt the statement made by the Officer of the Government on affidavit. 5. In view of the above observations, we see no disobedience of any of the orders passed by the High Court in the present proceedings. Contempt Petition is, therefore, required to be closed. 6. Before closing, however, we require the Respondents to provide the details of tax appeals and references pending before various Aut....
TaxTMI