2019 (5) TMI 865
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... For The Petitioner : Mr. G. Narendra Chetty For The Respondents : Mr. T. Vinod Kumar And Special Standing Counsel ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice V. Ramasubramanian) Aggrieved by an order of assessment passed under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, the Dealer has come up with the above writ petition. 2. Heard Mr. G. Narendra Chetty, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. T. V....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... are of the view that one opportunity should be given to the petitioner. But, since the respondents were not at fault, we directed the petitioner to make payment of a sum of Rs. 3,00,000/-. The said order has been complied with by the petitioner. 5. In view of the above, the writ petition is allowed, the impugned order is set aside and the petitioner is directed to file their reply to the show ....
TaxTMI