2019 (5) TMI 829

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....2016 in Final Order Nos.41839 and 41840/2016. 2.The above appeals have been filed raising the following substantial questions of law:- "(i) On facts and in the circumstances, was the learned Single Member of the Tribunal justified in assuming jurisdiction for hearing of Appeal No.C/40787/2016, in a manner contrary to Section 129C(4)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, in as much as the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) has decided the issue based entirely on classification of goods? (ii) On facts, and in the circumstances, was the Tribunal correct in dismissing ex parte the Appeal No.C/40787/2016? (iii) On facts and in the circumstances, was the Tribunal correct in holding that the Revenue had filed appeal before the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....filed by the appellant/importer was scrutinised by the adjudicating authority and the claim made by them was examined on the conditions stipulated in the notifications, more particularly, as contained in Notification No.6/2008-Cus dated 28.04.2008. 6.The original authority sanctioned two refund claims, one for Rs. 7,21,828/- and the second for Rs. 4,86,347/- in full, after recording that the Chartered Accountant had certified the correlation between the "goods imported" by the appellant and the "goods sold" by the appellant in India. The Department preferred appeals before the first appellate authority, who dismissed the appeals on account of delay in filing the appeal under Section 129 D(3) of the Act. On appeals before the Tribunal, th....