Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1996 (3) TMI 60

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....icant (Commissioner of Income-tax, Bhopal), has filed this application under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short, "the Act"), seeking direction to the Tribunal to state the case and refer the proposed questions of law, as extracted below, arising out of the order dated June 28, 1991, passed by it in I. T. A. No. 367/(Ind) of 1989 after rejection of its application registered as R....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....icer found that the assessee received sales tax subsidy of Rs. 38,631 which was treated by him as a revenue receipt. In appeal, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) held that the same was a capital receipt and accordingly deleted the addition. The applicant then filed an appeal before the Tribunal. Following the decision reported in CIT v. Dusad Industries [1986] 162 ITR 784 (MP), the Tribunal....